
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
香港理工大学土木及环境工程学系,香港 999077
刘俊才(1994—),男,博士. 研究方向:输电线路抗震与韧性. Email: juncai.liu@polyu.edu.hk
董 优(1986—),副教授,Email: you.dong@polyu.edu.hk
收稿日期:2025-03-16,
修回日期:2025-03-30,
网络出版日期:2025-05-19,
移动端阅览
刘俊才,董优.考虑序列地震方向性的输电塔-线体系失效风险研究[J].工程科学与技术,
LIU Juncai,DONG You.Failure Risk Investigation of Transmission Tower-line System Under Sequential Earthquake Considering Input Directionality[J].Advanced Engineering Sciences,XXXX,XX(XX):1‒11.
刘俊才,董优.考虑序列地震方向性的输电塔-线体系失效风险研究[J].工程科学与技术, DOI:10.12454/j.jsuese.202500178.
LIU Juncai,DONG You.Failure Risk Investigation of Transmission Tower-line System Under Sequential Earthquake Considering Input Directionality[J].Advanced Engineering Sciences,XXXX,XX(XX):1‒11. DOI: 10.12454/j.jsuese.202500178.
地震动通常以序列形式发生,且具有随机性和多维性;传统仅考虑单一主震不同输入方向的输电线路动力响应规律不能准确反映序列地震方向性的影响,因此有必要开展序列地震不同输入方向激励下输电塔-线体系抗震性能和失效风险水平研究。首先,考虑钢构件非线性力学行为和塔-线复杂耦合效应,建立输电塔-线体系精细化有限元模型;随后在太平洋地震动数据库中选取系列真实主震和相应余震,构建真实主余震序列;根据输电塔震损程度和非线性推覆分析,定义多目标抗震性能状态并量化相应状态阈值;开展主余震序列激励下输电塔-线体系动力响应分析,按照概率需求模型、易损概率和地震风险水平的层次思路,揭示序列地震方向性对输电塔-线体系抗震性能的影响规律。结果表明:相比于单一主震,不同输入方向的余震均会对输电塔-线体系造成额外损伤;随着地震动强度增加,主余震序列和单一主震下输电塔-线体系的易损状态和风险水平差异呈现先增大后减小的趋势,强调考虑序列余震的必要性;此外,序列地震方向性对输电塔-线体系失效风险水平的影响较小,影响程度随着地震动强度增加而逐渐显著;建议当输电塔处于中等或严重破坏状态时,应当考虑序列地震输入方向性的影响。本文以期为主余震序列下输电线路风险评估和性能提升提供参考。
Objective
2
Transmission tower-line structures are representative spatial distribution systems. They typically span hundreds or even thousands of kilometers and inevitably traverse regions with high seismic intensities. Characterized by high flexibility
long spans
and strong nonlinearity
the transmission tower-line system is prone to damage or even collapse ender earthquakes
which can result in regional power outages and substantial economic losses. A substantial amount of historical seismic data has indicated that ground motion generally occurs in the form of sequences
with randomness and multi-dimensional characteristics. Employing only single mainshocks with different input directions to excite the transmission tower-line systems fails to precisely capture the impact of the input directionality of sequential earthquakes on their dynamic responses. Therefore
it is essential to explore the seismic performance and failure risk level of the transmission tower-line system under the excitation of sequential earthquakes from various input directions.
Methods
2
Firstly
taking into account the intricate tower-line coupling effect
a refined finite element model of the transmission tower-line system is developed using ABAQUS software. A nonlinear hysteretic model is employed to mimic the complex mechanical behavior of steel members
encompassing buckling and post-buckling phenomena
as well as the degradation of strength and stiffness. Subsequently
a series of actual mainshocks and their corresponding aftershocks are chosen from the Pacific ground motion
database to formulate real mainshock-aftershock sequences. In accordance with the earthquake damage degree and nonlinear pushover analysis of the transmission tower
the multi-objective seismic performance states are defined
and the corresponding state limits are quantified. Owing to the symmetrical nature of the two main axes of the transmission tower-line system
this paper opts to analyze the dynamic response of the transmission tower-line system under the excitation of the mainshock-aftershock sequences from five input directions. Based on the hierarchical approach of the probabilistic demand model
fragility probability
and seismic risk level
the influence pattern of sequential seismic directivity on the seismic performance of the transmission tower-line system is uncovered.Results and Discussions When compared to the inter-segment drift ratios (
I
SDR
) under single mainshocks
the
I
SDR
of the transmission tower-line system under sequential earthquakes are larger. This phenomenon indicates that aftershocks cause additional damage to the transmission tower-line system. When the peak ground acceleration (
P
GA
) increases to 0.6
g
the
I
SDR
changes of the transmission tower-line system under single mainshocks and sequential earthquakes are basically consistent. The maximum
I
SDR
occurs between the second and third segments
suggesting that these two segments are the weak regions of the transmission tower. Regarding the different ground motion input directions considered
16%
50%
and 84% of the quintile incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) curves of the transmission tower-line system are all below the IDA curves for single mainshocks. This indicates that sequential earthquakes with smaller
P
GA
can lead to larger
ISDR
s
further highlighting the weakening effect of subsequent aftershocks on the seismic performance of
the transmission tower-line system. For the IDA curve with a 50% quintile value
the
I
SDR
under a
P
GA
of 0.6
g
ranges from 1.3% to 1.9% under different input directions
suggesting that the seismic directionality has certain impacts on the seismic performance of the transmission tower-line system. When single mainshocks with a
P
GA
of 0.8
g
are input along the five studied directions
the probabilities of the transmission tower-line system reaching or exceeding the collapse state (
D
S4
) are 0.60
0.54
0.59
0.53
and 0.55 respectively. For the sequential earthquakes
the corresponding fragility probabilities are 0.74
0.73
0.75
0.75
and 0.77 respectively. The fragility probability increases by 41.5%
which implies that subsequent aftershocks exacerbate the damage state of the transmission tower-line system and increase its risk of collapse. Compared to the results under single mainshocks
the annual risk probability curves of the
ISDR
of the transmission tower-line system under different input directions are all higher. The differences between the two annual risk probability curves become more significant as the
I
SDR
increases. Taking
I
SDR
=4.0% as an example
the annual risk probability of the transmission tower-line system increases by 0.91%
3.89%
1.83%
3.20%
and 3.70% respectively under sequential earthquakes with input directions of 0
22.5°
45.0°
67.5°
and 90.0°. This further emphasizes that subsequent aftershocks increase the earthquake damage probability of the transmission tower-line system. Compared to single mainshocks
when the input direction is 67.5° and the design reference period is increased from 1 year to 100 years
the risk probability of the transmission tower-line system reaching different performance states increases by 1.28%
2.52%
3.13%
3.62%
and 4.05% respectively.
Moreover
for all performance states
the risk probability curve of earthquake damage of the transmission tower-line system under different input directions shows an arc-shaped pattern
indicating that the input direction has relatively little influence.
Conclusions
2
In the case where the transmission tower-line system is experiencing slight damage (
D
S1
)
the variation in the fragility curves across different input directions of ground motions is relatively small. As the performance state shifts from
D
S1
to
D
S4
the discrepancy between the vulnerability curves corresponding to different input directions becomes increasingly pronounced. For all performance states
an input direction of 90.0° proves to be the least favorable input direction. As the earthquake intensity rises
the difference in the risk level of the transmission tower-line system between the mainshock-aftershock sequences and single mainshocks first increases and then decreases. This highlights the necessity of taking subsequent aftershocks into account. It is recommended that the impacts of sequential aftershocks be considered when the transmission tower is in a moderate or severe damage state.
Liu Juncai , Meng Xiangrui , Tian Li , et al . Failure mechanisms and seismic fragility analysis of overhead transmission lines incorporating pile-soil-structure interaction [J ] . Engineering Failure Analysis , 2024 , 160 : 108201 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. engfailanal. 2024.108201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108201 .
Zhou Zhou , Yu Xiaohui , Lv Dagang , et al . Effects of corrosion and aftershock on structural damage and fragility of reinforced concrete frame structures [J ] . Engineering Mechanics , 2023 , 40 ( 09 ): 203 - 213+256 . DOI: 10.6052/j. issn.1000-4750.2022.09.0813 http://dx.doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.09.0813
周洲 , 于晓辉 , 吕大刚 , 等 . 钢筋锈蚀与余震对RC框架结构地震损伤与易损性的影响分析 [J ] . 工程力学 , 2023 , 40 ( 09 ): 203 - 213+256 . DOI: 10.6052/j. issn.1000-4750.2022.09.0813 http://dx.doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2022.09.0813 .
Li Xiulin , Wen Weiping , Zhai Changhai . A framework for the lifecycle cost assessment of structures considering multiple mainshock-aftershock sequences [J ] . Journal of Building Engineering , 2022 , 48 : 103940 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10394 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10394 .
Dong Chengyan , Luo Mingliang , Chang Xiaoli , et al . Spatial location behavior of aftershocks of Wenchuan Ms8.0 and Lushan Ms7.0 earthquakes [J ] . Acta Seismologica Sinica , 2015 , 37 ( 01 ): 113 - 124+205 . DOI: 10.11939/ jass.2015.01.010 http://dx.doi.org/10.11939/jass.2015.01.010
董丞妍 , 罗明良 , 昌小莉 , 等 . 汶川及芦山地震余震分布的空间尺度效应 [J ] . 地震学报 , 2015 , 37 ( 01 ): 113 - 124+205 . DOI: 10.11939/ jass.2015.01.010 http://dx.doi.org/10.11939/jass.2015.01.010 .
World Health Organization . Türkiye earthquake: external situation report no . 5 : 13 – 19 March 2023 [M ] . Türkiye earthquake : external situation report no . 5: 13 – 19 March 2023. 2023.
Zhou Zhou , Lu Dagang , Gardoni P , et al . Probabilistic risk assessment for reinforced concrete frame structures subject to mainshock-aftershock sequences [J ] . Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics , 2024 , 53 ( 7 ): 2405 - 2422 . DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1002/eqe.4121 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4121 .
Xiang Nailiang , Wang Jian , Xu Hanxiang , et al . Seismic performance of continuous bridges under mainshock-aftershock-like sequences with rotatable bonded laminated rubber bearings accommodating support rotation [J ] . Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering , 2025 , 191 : 109234 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. soildyn.2025.109234 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109234 .
Jiang Hao , Xu Longhe , Xie Xingsi , et al . Pseudo-dynamic tests of steel frame with disc spring self-centering energy dissipation braces under doublet earthquake and mainshock-aftershock sequence [J ] . Engineering Structures , 2024 , 316 : 118524 . DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118524 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118524 .
Pang Rui , Zai Dezhi , Xu Bin , et al . Stochastic dynamic and reliability analysis of AP1000 nuclear power plants via DPIM subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences [J ] . Reliability Engineering & System Safety , 2023 , 235 : 109217 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress. 2023.109217 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109217 .
Kassem M M , Beddu S , Qi Min W , et al . Quantification of the seismic behavior of a steel transmission tower subjected to single and repeated seismic excitations using vulnerability function and collapse margin ratio [J ] . Applied Sciences , 2022 , 12 ( 4 ): 1984 . DOI: https://doi. org/10.3390/app12041984 https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041984 .
Liu Juncai , Tian Li , Meng Xiangrui , et al . Seismic fragility assessment of a transmission tower considering mainshock-aftershock sequences [J ] . Journal of Constructional Steel Research , 2022 , 194 : 107344 . DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107344 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107344 .
Liu Juncai . Probabilistic risk analysis and resilience assessment of a transmission tower-line system subjected to mainshock- aftershock sequences [D ] . Shandong University , 2023 .
刘俊才 . 主余震序列下输电塔-线体系概率性风险分析与韧性评估 [D ] . 山东大学 , 2023 .
Zhang Hongyang , Wang Haoyu , Yang Yige , et al . Research on risk-based seismic safety evaluation methods for high earth and rockfill dams [J ] . Advanced Engineering Sciences:1 - 16 . DOI: 10.12454/j.jsuese.202400388 http://dx.doi.org/10.12454/j.jsuese.202400388
张宏洋 , 王浩宇 , 杨益格 , 等 . 基于风险分析的高土石坝抗震安全评估方法研究 [J ] . 工程科学与技术:1 - 16 . DOI: 10.12454/j.jsuese.202400388 http://dx.doi.org/10.12454/j.jsuese.202400388 .
Zhou Zhou , Yu Xiaohui , Gardoni P , et al . Seismic risk estimates for reinforced concrete structures with incorporation of corrosion and aftershock [J ] . Reliability Engineering & System Safety , 2025 , 254 : 110585 . DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110585 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110585 .
Bao Xu , Zhai Changhai , Xu Longjun . Time-dependent risk assessment of a containment building subjected to mainshock-aftershock seismic sequences [J ] . Journal of Structural Engineering , 2022 , 148 ( 4 ): 04022010 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) ST.1943-541X.0003300 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003300 .
Liu Jieya , Huang Xiaoning , He Ting , et al . Seismic risk analysis for inter-story isolation structure collapse under main aftershock sequence [J ] . Journal of Vibration and Shock , 2023 , 42 ( 19 ): 194 - 203+259 . DOI: 10.13465/ j.cnki.jvs.2023.19.026 http://dx.doi.org/10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2023.19.026
刘洁亚 , 黄小宁 , 何婷 , 等 . 主余震序列作用下层间隔震结构倒塌地震风险分析 [J ] . 振动与冲击 , 2023 , 42 ( 19 ): 194 - 203+259 . DOI: 10.13465/ j.cnki.jvs.2023.19.026 http://dx.doi.org/10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2023.19.026 .
Zhang Yongjun , Wang Zhuolin , Jiang Lixue , et al . Seismic fragility analysis of masonry structures considering the effect of mainshock-aftershock sequences [J ] . Engineering Structures , 2023 , 275 : 115287 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022. 115287 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115287 .
Liu Juncai , Tian Li , Yang Meng , et al . Probabilistic framework for seismic resilience assessment of transmission tower-line systems subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences [J ] . Reliability Engineering & System Safety , 2024 , 242 : 109755 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ress.2023.109755 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109755 .
Liu Chuncheng , Yan Zhao , Jiang Tao , et al . Experimental study on failure modes of a transmission tower reinforced with clamps [J ] . Engineering Failure Analysis , 2024 , 159 : 108151 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. engfailanal.2024.108151 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108151 .
Liu Kaiyue . Seismic vulnerability analysis of UHV transmission tower-line system considering SSI [D ] . Shandong University , 2023 .
刘凯悦 . 考虑SSI的特高压输电塔-线体系地震易损性分析 [D ] . 山东大学 , 2023 .
Liu Juncai , Yang Meng , Tian Li , et al . Progressive failure and seismic fragility analysis for transmission towers considering buckling effect [J ] . Journal of Constructional Steel Research , 2023 , 208 : 108029 . DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108029 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108029 .
Liu Juncai , Tian Li , Ma Ruisheng , et al . Phenomenological hysteretic model for fixed-end steel equal-leg angle: Development and application [J ] . Thin-Walled Structures , 2023 , 183 : 110335 . DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.tws.2022.110335 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.110335 .
Hu Jie , Wen Weiping , Zhai Changhai , et al . Seismic resilience assessment of buildings considering the effects of mainshock and multiple aftershocks [J ] . Journal of Building Engineering 2023 ; 68 : 106110 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106110 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106110 .
Zheng Xiaowei , Li Hongnan , Zhang Yingying , et al . Probabilistic seismic demand models and risk assessment for high-rise buildings [J ] . Engineering Mechanics , 2022 , 39 ( 9 ): 31 - 39 . DOI: 10.6052/j.issn. 1000-4750.2021.05.0329 http://dx.doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2021.05.0329
郑晓伟 , 李宏男 , 张营营 , 等 . 基于概率的高层建筑地震需求模型与风险评估 [J ] . 工程力学 , 2022 , 39 ( 9 ): 31 - 39 . DOI: 10.6052/j.issn. 1000-4750.2021.05.0329 http://dx.doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2021.05.0329 .
Liu Juncai , Meng Xiangrui , Tian Li , et al . Multi-metric evaluation of the optimal intensity measure for mainshock-aftershock fragility analysis of transmission towers [J ] . Engineering Structures , 2024 , 308 : 118020 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118020 .
Zheng Guozu , Jiao Yingqian , Shi Yan , et al . System fragility and probabilistic seismic risk of continuous rigid-frame bridge considering the pounding response between main beam and transition pier [J ] . Advanced Engineering Sciences , 2024 , 56 ( 3 ): 147 - 159 . DOI: 10. 15961/j.jsuese.202200981 http://dx.doi.org/10.15961/j.jsuese.202200981
郑国足 , 焦应乾 , 石岩 , 等 . 考虑墩–梁碰撞效应的连续刚构桥系统易损性与概率地震风险性分析 [J ] . 工程科学与技术 , 2024 , 56 ( 3 ): 147 - 159 . DOI: 10. 15961/j.jsuese.202200981 http://dx.doi.org/10.15961/j.jsuese.202200981 .
Du Ao , Wang Xiaowei , Xie Yazhou , et al . Regional seismic risk and resilience assessment: Methodological development, applicability, and future research needs–An earthquake engineering perspective [J ] . Reliability Engineering & System Safety , 2023 , 233 : 109104 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress. 2023.109104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109104 .
GB 18306-2015 , 中国地震动参数区划图 [S ] . 北京 : 中国标准出版社 , 2015 .
Wang Debin , Xia Qing , Sun Zhiguo , et al . [J]. Seismic fragility comparative research of sea-crossing bridges with scour conditions under onshore and offshore ground motions [J ] . Advanced Engineering Sciences , 2021 , 53 ( 5 ): 127 - 137 . DOI: 10.15961/j.jsuese. 202000910 http://dx.doi.org/10.15961/j.jsuese.202000910
王德斌 , 夏青 , 孙治国 , 等 . 冲刷环境下跨海桥梁海陆地震动作用易损性对比研究 [J ] . 工程科学与技术 , 2021 , 53 ( 5 ): 127 - 137 . DOI: 10.15961/j.jsuese. 202000910 http://dx.doi.org/10.15961/j.jsuese.202000910 .
Dai Kaoshan , Zhao Zhi , Meng Jiayao . Failure probability evaluations of a wind turbine under earthquakes and wind loads [J ] . Advanced Engineering Sciences , 2021 , 53 ( 2 ): 38 - 44 . DOI: 10.15961/j.jsuese. 202000323 http://dx.doi.org/10.15961/j.jsuese.202000323
戴靠山 , 赵志 , 孟家瑶 . 风电塔在地震和风荷载下的失效概率评估 [J ] . 工程科学与技术 , 2021 , 53 ( 2 ): 38 - 44 . DOI: 10.15961/j.jsuese. 202000323 http://dx.doi.org/10.15961/j.jsuese.202000323 .
Li Zhengliang , Nie Yuanchen , Wang Tao , et al . Fragility analysis on vertical earthquake of UHV long cantilever transmission tower cross-arm structure [J ] . Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences) , 2025 , 52 ( 1 ): 84 - 92 . DOI: 10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb. 2025008 http://dx.doi.org/10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb.2025008
李正良 , 聂元晨 , 王涛 , 等 . 特高压长悬臂输电塔横担结构竖向地震易损性分析 [J ] . 湖南大学学报(自然科学版) , 2025 , 52 ( 1 ): 84 - 92 . DOI: 10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb. 2025008 http://dx.doi.org/10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb.2025008 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621