###
工程科学与技术:2023,55(2):214-221
←前一篇   |   后一篇→
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
一种改进的真三轴Hoek-Brown强度准则
(1.西南石油大学 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610500;2.四川大学 水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610065)
An Improved True Triaxial Hoek-Brown Strength Criterion
(1.State Key Lab. of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, China;2.State Key Lab. of Hydraulic and Mountain River Eng., Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610065, China)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 390次   下载 241
投稿时间:2021-11-10    修订日期:2022-03-17
中文摘要: Hoek–Brown强度准则已经广泛应用于岩石与岩体力学分析、岩石边坡稳定性分析、岩石隧道设计等领域,但常规Hoek–Brown强度准则未考虑中间主应力对岩石强度的影响,应用上不能反映岩石的真三轴力学性能,因此有必要对Hoek–Brown强度准则进行改进。通过分析岩石的真三轴试验结果,明确了岩石中间主应力对岩石强度的影响存在增强和抑制两种特征,当中间主应力大于临界值$\sigma_2^* $时,岩石强度被增强;当中间主应力小于临界值$\sigma_2^* $时,岩石强度被减弱。基于中间主应力的临界应力状态,引入中间主应力系数β,将一种2维Hoek–Brown强度准则改进为真三轴Hoek–Brown强度准则。采用非线性拟合方法确定了模型中的参数,通过对比8种岩石类型的真三轴试验数据,对改进后强度准则的精确性和普适性进行验证,并与其他3种真三轴强度准则做对比。结果表明:改进的真三轴强度准则的最佳参数m取值均能落在Hoek和Brown建议的取值区间,能够继承Hoek–Brown强度准则的优点。改进后的强度准则对8种岩石类型的均方根差(RMSE)均低于另外3种准则,能够准确预测岩石强度,且适用于大多数岩石类型,较好地体现了中间主应力对岩石强度的影响;Pan–Hudson准则总是在低σ2条件下高估岩石强度值,在高σ2条件下低估岩石强度值;Zhang–Zhu和Priest准则对岩石类型具有较强依赖性,描述精度较差。因此,改进的真三轴Hoek–Brown强度准则具有重要的应用推广价值。
Abstract:Hoek–Brown strength criterion has been widely used in rock and rock mechanics analysis, rock slope stability analysis, rock tunnel design, and other fields, but the conventional Hoek–Brown strength criterion does not consider the influence of intermediate principal stress on rock strength, and its application cannot reflect the true triaxial mechanical properties of rock. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the Hoek–Brown strength criterion. By analyzing the true triaxial test results of rock, the influence law of rock intermediate principal stress on rock strength was clarified. There are two characteristics of strengthening and restraining its influence: when it is greater than the critical value $\sigma_2^* $, the rock strength is enhanced, and when it is less than the critical value $\sigma_2^* $, the rock strength is weakened. Based on the critical stress state of the intermediate principal stress, the intermediate principal stress coefficient β was introduced, and a two-dimensional Hoek–Brown strength criterion was improved to the true triaxial Hoek–Brown strength criterion. The parameters in the model were determined by the nonlinear fitting method. By comparing the true triaxial test data of 8 rock types, the accuracy and universality of the improved strength criterion were verified. and compared with the other three true triaxial strength criteria. The results show that the best parameter m of the improved true triaxial strength criterion can fall within the range suggested by Hoek and Brown, and can inherit the advantages of the Hoek–Brown strength criterion. The predicted root mean square difference (RMSE) values of the improved strength criterion for the eight rock types are lower than those of the other three criteria, which can accurately predict the rock strength, is suitable for most rock types, and better reflects the influence of the intermediate principal stress on the rock strength. The Pan–Hudson criterion always overestimates the rock strength value under low σ2 conditions and underestimates the rock strength value under high σ2 conditions. The Zhang–Zhu and Priest criteria have a strong dependence on the rock type and the description accuracy is relatively poor. The improved true triaxial Hoek–Brown strength criterion has an important application and promotion value.
文章编号:202101127     中图分类号:TU45    文献标志码:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重点项目(地区联合基金)(U20A20266);四川省科技厅项目(2022YFSY0007);国家自然科学基金面上项目 (51774248)
作者简介:第一作者:石祥超(1981—),男,教授,博士生导师. 研究方向:石油工程岩石力学. E-mail:sxcdream@163.com;通信作者:刘建锋, 教授,E-mail:liujf@scu.edu.cn
引用文本:
石祥超,李清鲮,刘建锋,高雷雨,卓肖.一种改进的真三轴Hoek-Brown强度准则[J].工程科学与技术,2023,55(2):214-221.
SHI Xiangchao,LI Qingling,LIU Jianfeng,GAO Leiyu,ZHUO Xiao.An Improved True Triaxial Hoek-Brown Strength Criterion[J].Advanced Engineering Sciences,2023,55(2):214-221.