###
DOI:
工程科学与技术:2012,44(Z1):77-82
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
暴雨山洪水动力学模型及其简化模型的比较研究
(武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室)
Comparative Study of Simplified and Full Hydrodynamic Models for Flash Floods
(Wuhan University)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
附件
本文已被:浏览 1963次   下载 0
投稿时间:2011-09-19    修订日期:2012-01-26
中文摘要: 二维水动力学模型及其简化模型(运动波模型和扩散波模型)被广泛地用于暴雨山洪等问题研究,但由于缺少相关的规范来指导不同模型的应用,给暴雨山洪问题的模拟和研究造成了困难。本文首先从基本控制方程出发,分析了水动力学模型、运动波模型和扩散波模型在物理机制上的差异。然后将三个模型用于试验室条件下的非恒定旁侧入流、降雨径流算例和三甲乡暴雨山洪算例,探讨了不同模型的适用性和可靠性。结果表明,不同的模型由于理论上不同程度的简化导致应用范围和计算精度存在较大差别,简化的水动力学模型即使在率定的糙率下也不能准确模拟试验条件下的降雨径流过程,而在研究自然尺度下,如三甲乡山洪过程中也有很大的不确定性。为了准确地预报山洪过程,必须采用完整的浅水动力学数学模型。
Abstract:Two dimentional simplified (including kinematic wave and diffusion wave) and full hydrodynamic models have been widely applied to the study of flash floods. However, there are still few guidelines to help modelers to select an apropriate model for flash flood simulation on field scale. This paper, firstly, presented a comparative study of simplified and full hydrodynamic models in terms of physical basis. Then, the models were applied to unsteady flow with lateral inflow, experimental rainfall-runoff and a field study case in Sanjia village respectively to explore their stability and applicability. The results showed that differences in theoretical basis results in differences of limitations in applicability and accuracy in simulation: even under the calibration of Manning roughness, the simplified hydrodynamic models were invalid for simulating the rainfall-runoff on experimental scale and were unsuitable for modeling on field scale like Sanjia village study case. The full hydrodynamic model was needed for the accurate simulation of flash floods.
文章编号:201100827     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Pan Jia-jia Wuhan University jiajiapan@whu.edu.cn 
作者简介:
引用文本:
潘佳佳.暴雨山洪水动力学模型及其简化模型的比较研究[J].工程科学与技术,2012,44(Z1):77-82.
Pan Jia-jia.Comparative Study of Simplified and Full Hydrodynamic Models for Flash Floods[J].Advanced Engineering Sciences,2012,44(Z1):77-82.