Study on the dynamic response for framed anchors in landslide prevention

wang Ban-Qiao

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Study on the dynamic response for framed anchors in landslide prevention

更新时间：2023-11-14

- Study on the dynamic response for framed anchors in landslide prevention
- Advanced Engineering Sciences Vol. 48, Issue 3, Pages: 48-54(2016)
- 作者机构：
  
  长安大学
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC：
- Published：2016，
  
  Published Online：5 January 2016，
扫描看全文
汪班桥.滑坡防治格构梁锚杆地震动力响应分析[J].工程科学与技术,2016,48(3):48-54.

wang Ban-Qiao. Study on the dynamic response for framed anchors in landslide prevention. [J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences 48(3):48-54(2016)
汪班桥.滑坡防治格构梁锚杆地震动力响应分析[J].工程科学与技术,2016,48(3):48-54. DOI：

wang Ban-Qiao. Study on the dynamic response for framed anchors in landslide prevention. [J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences 48(3):48-54(2016) DOI：

摘要

中文摘要: 针对锚杆格构支护的均质土坡在地震作用下的动力响应，通过振动台模型试验，研究锚固边坡在地震作用下的动力响应差别、不同坡高锚杆在地震作用下的受力机制，揭示了均质土坡及其支护结构在地震作用下的变形破坏机理。结果表明:地震激励作用下，锚杆的动应变对低频、高量级加速度的地震波反应较为敏感；加速度量级由低→中→高变化时，锚固边坡中承担较大荷载作用的锚杆位置也发生着变化，对应的调整顺序为：中层→顶层→中层；地震强度足够大时，中层锚杆首先破坏，其次是底层锚杆。所以地震荷载作用下锚固边坡的设计不仅要遵循传统的设计思想“强腰固脚”，而且要对上部锚杆的锚头及坡面进行加强处理，防止受到地震浅表效应的影响；并应充分考虑大、小震作用下边坡动力响应的差异。研究结果为更加合理地进行锚杆抗震设计提供了良好的基础。

Abstract

Abstract:In order to study the dynamic response of homogeneous soil slope supported by anchors and lattices under seismiv loading

based on the shaking table test

the mechanism behavior of anchor bars under earthquake

and the difference of dynamic response of anchor bars at different heights were analyzed

and the deformation and failure machanisms of homogeneous soil slope and its supporting structures under seismic load were discussed. Experimental results showed

under dynamic loading

the dynamic strain of anchor was hypersensitive to low-frequency and high magnitude of acceleration of earthquake wave; acceleration magnitude changed from low to medium to high

the position of the bolt to bear larger load also changed in anchored slope

the corresponding order was from middle to top to middle; if the earthquake intensity was large enough

the middle anchor would be damaged firstly

followed by the bottom bolt. The traditional design idea “strenthening slope waist and fixing slope toe” should be used when an anti-seismic anchorage system is designed to make a slope stable. In addition

strengthening the anchor heads of top-row anchors and the upper slope face is a good method to protect the slope from being influenced by the seismic superficial effect. The difference of slope dynamic response should been fully considered under small or big earthquake. The results provided a reasonable foundation for the design of the anchor bars supporting under earthquake．

关键词

均质土坡地震作用动力响应振动台试验锚杆

Keywords

homogeneous soil slopeearthquakedynamic responseshaking table testancho

references

更多指标>

Views

1585

下载量

CNKI被引量

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Shaking Table Test of Time-history Response of Bridge Pile Foundation Near Fault in Strong Earthquake Area

Influences of Vibration Load of Elevated Subway Train on the Stress and Deformation of Adjacent Structures

Dynamic and Energy Dissipation Performance of Single-story Pavilion-type Timber Frame

Seismic Dynamic Response and Failure Mode of Cracked Bedding Rock Slope

Shaking Table Experiment of Prefabricated Lightweight Steel Composite Frames–Perlite Insulation Reinforced with Steel Wire Mesh Composite Wall Structure

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

Hainan Provincial Transportation Planning Survey and Design Research Inst.

Center for Quality and Safety of Traffic Construction in Fujian Province

School of Highway, Chang’an Univ.

CCFEB Civil Eng. Co., Ltd.

National Eng. Research Center of High Speed Railway Construction Technol., Central South Univ.

⁰